Netanyahu’s new government accentuates West’s hypocrisy

Even before the new Israeli government was officially sworn in on Dec. 29, angry reactions began emerging, not only among Palestinians and other Middle Eastern governments, but also among Israel’s historic allies in the West. As early as Nov. 2, top US officials conveyed to Axios that the Biden administration was “unlikely to engage with Jewish supremacist politician, Itamar Ben-Gvir.”

In fact, the US government’s apprehensions surpassed Ben-Gvir, who was convicted by Israel’s own court system in 2007 for supporting a terrorist organization and inciting racism. US Secretary of State Antony Blinken and National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan reportedly “hinted” that the US government would also boycott “other right-wing extremists” in Netanyahu’s government.

However, these strong concerns seemed absent from the congratulatory statement sent by US Ambassador to Israel Tom Nides the following day. Nides relayed that he had “congratulated (Netanyahu) on his victory and told him that I look forward to working together to maintain the unbreakable bond” between the two countries. In other words, this “unbreakable bond” is stronger than any public US concern regarding terrorism, extremism, fascism and criminal activities.

Ben-Gvir is not the only convicted criminal in Netanyahu’s government. Aryeh Deri, the leader of the ultra-Orthodox Shas party, was convicted of tax fraud in early 2022 and, in 2000, he served a prison sentence for accepting bribes when he held the position of interior minister. Bezalel Smotrich is another controversial character whose anti-Palestinian racism has dominated his political persona for many years.

While Ben-Gvir has been assigned the post of national security minister, Deri has been entrusted with the Ministry of Interior and Smotrich with the Ministry of Finance.

Palestinians and Arab countries are rightly angry because they understand that the new government is likely to sow more violence and chaos. With many of Israel’s most sinister politicians in one place, Arabs know that Israel’s illegal annexation of parts of the Occupied Territories is back on the agenda; and that incitement against Palestinians in East Jerusalem, coupled with raids of Al-Aqsa Mosque, will exponentially increase in the coming weeks and months. And the push for the construction and expansion of illegal settlements is likely to grow too.

Signs of the US’ willingness to accommodate whichever extremist politicians Israel produces are already on display

Ramzy Baroud

These are not unfounded fears. Aside from the very racist and violent statements and actions made by Netanyahu and his allies in recent years, the new government has already declared that the Jewish people have “exclusive and inalienable rights to all parts of the Land of Israel.” It has promised to expand settlements, while distancing itself from any commitments to establishing a Palestinian state or even engaging in any peace process.

But while Palestinians and their Arab allies have been largely consistent in recognizing extremism in the various Israeli governments, what excuse do the US and the wider West have for failing to recognize that the latest Netanyahu-led government is the most rational outcome of blindly supporting Israel throughout the years?

In March 2019, Politico branded Netanyahu the creator of “the most right-wing government in Israeli history” — a sentiment that was repeated countless times in other Western media outlets. This ideological shift was recognized by Israel’s own media years earlier. In 2016, the popular Israeli newspaper Maariv described the Israeli government at the time as the “most right-wing and extremist” in the country’s history. This was, in part, due to the fact that far-right politician Avigdor Lieberman was assigned the role of defense minister.

The West also showed concern at that time, warning against the demise of Israel’s supposed liberal democracy and demanding that it must remain committed to the peace process and the two-state solution. None of that actualized. Instead, the terrifying figures in that government were rebranded as mere conservatives, centrists or even liberals in the following years.

The same is likely to happen now. In fact, signs of the US’ willingness to accommodate whichever extremist politicians Israel produces are already on display. In his Dec. 30 statement welcoming the new Israeli government, Joe Biden said nothing about the threat of Tel Aviv’s far-right politics to the Middle East region. Rather, he mentioned the “challenges” and “threats” posed by the region to Israel. In other words, Ben-Gvir or no Ben-Gvir, unconditional support for Israel by the US will remain intact.

If history is a lesson, any future violence and incitement in Palestine will be blamed mostly, if not entirely, on the Palestinians. This knee-jerk, pro-Israeli attitude has defined Israel’s relationship with the US, regardless of whether Israeli governments are led by extremists or supposed liberals. No matter, Israel always somehow maintains its false status as “the only democracy in the Middle East.”

But if we are to believe that Israel’s exclusivist and racially based “democracy” is a democracy at all, then we are justified in also believing that the new government is neither less nor more democratic than previous governments.

Yet, Western officials, commentators and even pro-Israel Jewish leaders and organizations in the US warned of the supposed danger facing Israel’s liberal democracy in the run-up to the formation of Netanyahu’s new government. This is an indirect, if not clever, form of whitewashing, as these views accept that what Israel has practiced since its founding in 1948, until today, was a form of real democracy. They also accept that Israel remained a democracy even after the 2018 passing of the controversial Nation-State Law, which defines Israel as a Jewish state, completely disregarding the rights of the country’s non-Jewish citizens.

It is only a matter of time before Israel’s extremist new government is also whitewashed as further working proof that Israel can strike a balance between being Jewish and also democratic at the same time.

The same story was repeated in 2016, when warnings over the rise of far-right extremism in Israel — following the Netanyahu-Lieberman pact — quickly faded and eventually vanished. Instead of boycotting that government, the US government finalized, in September 2016, its largest ever military aid package to Israel, amounting to $38 billion over a decade.

In truth, Israel has not changed much, either in its own self-definition or in its treatment of Palestinians. Failing to understand this is tantamount to tacit approval of Israel’s racist, violent and colonial policies in the Occupied Territories over the course of 75 years.

• Ramzy Baroud