U.N. General Assembly Asks Court to say what Israel Needs to Provide in Gaza
The vote on the Norwegian-sponsored resolution seeking an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice was 137-12, with 22 abstentions. The United States, Israel's closest ally, voted against the resolution
The U.N. General Assembly approved a resolution on Thursday (December 20, 2024) asking the U.N.’s highest court to State what Israel’s obligations are in Gaza and the West Bank to provide humanitarian assistance essential for the survival of Palestinian civilians.
The vote on the Norwegian-sponsored resolution seeking an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice was 137-12, with 22 abstentions. The United States, Israel’s closest ally, voted against the resolution.
Resolutions in the 193-member General Assembly are not legally binding, though they do reflect world opinion.
It follows the ICJ’s condemnation of Israel’s rule over lands it captured 57 years ago. In a non-binding opinion in July, the court said Israel’s presence in the occupied Palestinian territories is unlawful and called on Israel to end its occupation and halt settlement construction immediately.
Thursday’s resolution also follows Israeli laws passed in late October, which take effect in 90 days, that effectively ban the U.N. agency for Palestinian refugees, known as UNRWA, from operating in the Palestinian territories.
U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has stressed that no other U.N. agency can take on the UNRWA’s role and a U.N. spokesman reiterated on Thursday that under international law, as the occupying power, Israel would be responsible for fulfilling the basic needs of Palestinians if the UNRWA is banned.
Norway’s Deputy Foreign Minister, Andreas Kravik, told reporters that the international community has a responsibility to react to tens of thousands of deaths in Gaza and virtually the entire population experiencing acute hunger, and some near famine.
He said many countries, the U.N. and its agencies, and aid organisations are ready to step up their humanitarian efforts but the problem is “there is a lack of access”.
Israel’s U.N. Ambassador Danny Danon told the Assembly before the vote that its members were debating “the same recycled nonsense, where all that matters is attacking Israel and challenge its right to protect its citizens”.
“This time the Palestinians are using a new tool in this diplomatic circus: the International Court of Justice,” he said.
The resolution demands that Israel comply with all its legal obligations under international law, including by the U.N.’s top court.
The resolution seeks the ICJ’s guidance on additional questions about its July ruling, including what Israel’s obligations are “to ensure and facilitate the unhindered provision of urgently-needed supplies essential to the survival of the Palestinian civilian population”.
It expresses concern about the Israeli legislation on the UNRWA and Israeli measures to impede assistance to the Palestinians.